Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNulty, Duncanen_US
dc.contributor.editorProfessor William Scotten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:33:25Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.modified2009-12-04T05:22:57Z
dc.identifier.issn02602938en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02602930701293231en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/26182
dc.description.abstractThis article is about differences between, and the adequacy of, response rates to on line and paper-based course and teaching evaluation surveys. Its aim is to provide practical guidance on these matters. The first part of the article gives an overview of on-line surveying in general, a review of data relating to survey response rates and, practical advice to help boost response rates. The second part of the article discusses when a response rate may be considered big enough for the survey data to provide adequate evidence for accountability and improvement purposes. The article ends with suggestions for improving the effectiveness of evaluation strategy. These suggestions are: to seek to obtain the highest response rates possible to all surveys; to take account of probable effects of survey design and methods on the feedback obtained when interpreting that feedback; and, to enhance this action by making use of data derived from multiple methods of gathering feedback.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent96451 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02602938.aspen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom301en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto314en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume33en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode330206en_US
dc.titleThe adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Griffith Institute of Higher Educationen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2008 Taylor & Francis. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version.en_AU
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record