Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Brigiten_US
dc.contributor.authorRickard, Claireen_US
dc.contributor.authorFoote, Jonathonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGrail, Matthewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T12:57:47Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T12:57:47Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.modified2009-11-13T06:37:21Z
dc.identifier.issn13621017en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1362-1017.2006.00165.xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/26671
dc.description.abstractBackground : The Research Coordinator (RC) role is a relative new addition to staffing profiles in Australasian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). The RC plays a pivotal role in conducting ethically and scientifically sound research. There have been anecdotal reports of the RC role in various speciality areas. However, limited research has been undertaken into the role, and only one study has been published from the intensive care setting. Aim: To evaluate which factors the RC found to be the best and worst attributes of the role. Methods : A cross-sectional web-based cohort study was conducted in 2004 collecting free text information from RCs in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Results : Forty-nine participants (71%) completed the study with 273 entries into the two categories of 'best' (60%) and 'worst' (40%) aspects of the role. We identified four thematic clusters in both categories: (1) 'How the job was structured' (2) 'The worth of the job' (3) 'What the work involves' and (4) 'Who I work with'. Both categories received proportionally the same number of responses in each theme with (1) the most frequent and (4) the least number of entries. Conclusion : There is much variation between RCs in almost every descriptor of the role. The Australasian Intensive Care RC values autonomy, respect and intellectual stimulation with the scope for extending the role to suit the individual and finds isolation, under-recognition and workload, often not sufficiently compensated, to be the worst aspects of the position.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom128en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto135en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNursing in Critical Careen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume11en_US
dc.rights.retentionNen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321103en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321009en_US
dc.titleThe best and worst aspects of the ICU research coordinator roleen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2006
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record