Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCongress, Elaineen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcAuliffe, Donnaen_US
dc.contributor.editorKaren Lyonsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T12:48:44Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T12:48:44Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.modified2009-11-25T07:58:58Z
dc.identifier.issn00208728en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0020872806061211en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/26875
dc.description.abstracthis article compares and contrasts two main areas of the Australian and US codes of ethics for social workers. These have been selected for comparison because recent revisions in their provisions about dual relationships and confidentiality raise challenging questions about acceptable practice standards.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.publisher.placeUKen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom151en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto164en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue2en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Social Worken_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume49en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode370299en_US
dc.titleSocial work ethics: professional codes in Australia and the United Statesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2006
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record