Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcAuliffe, Donnaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T21:22:02Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T21:22:02Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.modified2013-08-28T22:33:50Z
dc.identifier.issn10520147en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/26879
dc.description.abstractEngaging human service practitioners as partners in research about sensitive areas of front-line work can be difficult for a range of reasons. Time constraints, geographic limitations, trust in the research relationship, issues of privacy, and fear of professional judgment are only some of the barriers that researchers need to overcome in order to assist workers to become involved in a reflective process about areas of practice. This article outlines the development of a new method of qualitative data collection designed to aid the reflective process and assist practitioners to engage in an ongoing dialogue about complex ethical dilemmas they had experienced in relation to their work with clients, colleagues, managers and organisations. These ethical dilemmas occurred in the contexts of health, mental health, child protection, work with young people, community work, disability, family violence, aged care and research. This is the story of how the concept of Email-Facilitated Reflective Dialogue was born. It is the story of how Email-Facilitated Reflective Dialogue became a method of data generation and a tool for reflection on issues of ethics, how twenty social workers throughout Australia experienced it as a reflective medium, and how we, as partners in research, experienced and evaluated the process.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent63511 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNova Southeastern Universityen_US
dc.publisher.placeUSAen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/mcauliffe.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom57en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto69en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Qualitative Reporten_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume8en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode370299en_US
dc.titleChallenging Methodological Traditions: Research by Emailen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2003 Nova Southeastern University and the author[s]. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.en_US
gro.date.issued2003
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record