• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Reasoning with the outcomes of plan execution in intentional agents

    Author(s)
    Cleaver, TW
    Sattar, A
    Wang, KW
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Sattar, Abdul
    Wang, Kewen
    Year published
    2005
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    For intentional agents to be rational they must be aware of their success and failure to truly assess their own progress towards their intended goals. In this study we describe a detailed investigation of how current intentional agents monitor their successes and failures during their reasoning cycle. Our analysis indicates that the existing architectures are inadequate to specifically detect failures in their own behaviors. This makes them unaware of the reality of the environment in which they are operating. We propose an extended intentional architecture to address these problems. We extend the current reasoning cycle by ...
    View more >
    For intentional agents to be rational they must be aware of their success and failure to truly assess their own progress towards their intended goals. In this study we describe a detailed investigation of how current intentional agents monitor their successes and failures during their reasoning cycle. Our analysis indicates that the existing architectures are inadequate to specifically detect failures in their own behaviors. This makes them unaware of the reality of the environment in which they are operating. We propose an extended intentional architecture to address these problems. We extend the current reasoning cycle by reformulating the execution of actions and plans, and introducing additional rules to detect failures. The resulting reformulation can be applied to existing systems such as JACK, JAM, etc. %As a case study we extended JASON to implement the extended BDI architecture.
    View less >
    Conference Title
    AI 2005: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Volume
    3809
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/2701
    Collection
    • Conference outputs

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander