Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorShichao Zhang, Ray Jarvisen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCleaver, Timen_US
dc.contributor.authorSattar, Abdulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Kewenen_US
dc.contributor.editorShichao Zhang, Ray Jarvisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:11:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:11:04Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2007-03-21T21:25:41Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://attend.it.uts.edu.au/ai05/en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/2701
dc.description.abstractFor intentional agents to be rational they must be aware of their success and failure to truly assess their own progress towards their intended goals. In this study we describe a detailed investigation of how current intentional agents monitor their successes and failures during their reasoning cycle. Our analysis indicates that the existing architectures are inadequate to specifically detect failures in their own behaviors. This makes them unaware of the reality of the environment in which they are operating. We propose an extended intentional architecture to address these problems. We extend the current reasoning cycle by reformulating the execution of actions and plans, and introducing additional rules to detect failures. The resulting reformulation can be applied to existing systems such as JACK, JAM, etc. %As a case study we extended JASON to implement the extended BDI architecture.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisher.placeGermanyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationYen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename18th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleAI2005 : Advances in Artificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2005-12-05en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2005-12-09en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationSydneyen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode280213en_US
dc.titleReasoning with the outcomes of plan execution in intentional agentsen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, School of Information and Communication Technologyen_US
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record