Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorMichael Murphyen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKane, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.editorJulie Wilsonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:10:28Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:10:28Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2009-11-05T06:02:45Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://auspsa.anu.edu.au/proceedings/publications/Kanepaper.pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/2747
dc.description.abstractDemocratic openness fosters truth-telling as a public value rather than secrecy or double-dealing. Yet democracies typically distrust their political leaders, having a tendency to regard them as shifty with regard to motives and slippery with regard to morals. Valuing truth and honesty in government, democrats too often suspect they are being dealt lies and half-truths. Yet there are some lies that democrats will tolerate from their leaders and others they will not. This paper will argue that the tensions produced in democratic leadership by the fact (rather than the fiction) of popular sovereignty explains both the tendency toward leadership hypocrisy and the manner in which democrats distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable lies. In democracies, rather than the people fearing the ruler, rulers must fear the people who can ultimately displace them. As always in situations of authority, the awed leader must often tell the sovereign what it wants to hear rather than the unpalatable truth, producing a perennial temptation toward hypocrisy. Similarly, the lies that democrats really care about are those whose tendency or intention is to usurp or undermine their sovereignty.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherAustralasian Political Studies Associationen_US
dc.publisher.placeDunedin, NZen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.auspsa.org.au/en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAustralasian Political Studies Association Conference 2005en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleAustralasian Political Studies Association Conference (APSA) 2005en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2005-09-28en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2005-09-30en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, NZen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode360104en_US
dc.titleMust Democratic Leaders Necessarily be Hypocrites?en_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, School of Government and International Relationsen_US
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record