Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeech, A
dc.contributor.authorSimes, R
dc.contributor.authorBarter, P
dc.contributor.authorBest, J
dc.contributor.authorScott, R
dc.contributor.authorTaskinen, M
dc.contributor.authorForder, P
dc.contributor.authorPillai, A
dc.contributor.authorDavis, T
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, P
dc.contributor.authorDrury, P
dc.contributor.authorKesäniemi, Y
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, D
dc.contributor.authorHunt, D
dc.contributor.authorColman, P
dc.contributor.authord'Emden, M
dc.contributor.authorWhiting, M
dc.contributor.authorEhnholm, C
dc.contributor.authorLaakso, M
dc.contributor.authorAnsquer, J-C
dc.contributor.authorFraitag, B
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, N
dc.contributor.authorHankey, G
dc.contributor.authorLehto, S
dc.contributor.authorMann, S
dc.contributor.authorRomo, M
dc.contributor.authorLi, L
dc.contributor.authorHennekens, C
dc.contributor.authorMacMahon, S
dc.contributor.authorPocock, S
dc.contributor.authorTonkin, A
dc.contributor.authorWilhelmsen, L
dc.contributor.authorForder, P
dc.contributor.authorAkauola, H
dc.contributor.authorAlford, F
dc.contributor.authorBeinart, I
dc.contributor.authorBohra, S
dc.contributor.authorBoyages, S
dc.contributor.authorConnor, H
dc.contributor.authorDarnell, D
dc.contributor.authorDavis, T
dc.contributor.authorDavoren, P
dc.contributor.authorLepre, F
dc.contributor.authorLooze, F
dc.contributor.authorDuffield, A
dc.contributor.authorFassett, R
dc.contributor.authorFlack, J
dc.contributor.authorFulcher, G
dc.contributor.authorHamwood, S
dc.contributor.authorHarmelin, D
dc.contributor.authorJackson, R.
dc.contributor.authoret al.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:00:26Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67667-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/27593
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, partly owing to dyslipidaemia, which can be amenable to fibrate therapy. We designed the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study to assess the effect of fenofibrate on cardiovascular disease events in these patients. Methods: We did a multinational, randomised controlled trial with 9795 participants aged 50–75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and not taking statin therapy at study entry. After a placebo and a fenofibrate run-in phase, we randomly assigned patients (2131 with previous cardiovascular disease and 7664 without) with a total-cholesterol concentration of 3·0–6·5 mmol/L and a total-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio of 4·0 or more or plasma triglyceride of 1·0–5·0 mmol/L to micronised fenofibrate 200 mg daily (n=4895) or matching placebo (n=4900). Our primary outcome was coronary events (coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction); the outcome for prespecified subgroup analyses was total cardiovascular events (the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary and carotid revascularisation). Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was prospectively registered (number ISRCTN 64783481). Findings: Vital status was confirmed on all but 22 patients. Averaged over the 5 years' study duration, similar proportions in each group discontinued study medication (10% placebo vs 11% fenofibrate) and more patients allocated placebo (17%) than fenofibrate (8%; p<0·0001) commenced other lipid treatments, predominantly statins. 5·9% (n=288) of patients on placebo and 5·2% (n=256) of those on fenofibrate had a coronary event (relative reduction of 11%; hazard ratio [HR] 0·89, 95% CI 0·75–1·05; p=0·16). This finding corresponds to a significant 24% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0·76, 0·62–0·94; p=0·010) and a non-significant increase in coronary heart disease mortality (1·19, 0·90–1·57; p=0·22). Total cardiovascular disease events were significantly reduced from 13·9% to 12·5% (0·89, 0·80–0·99; p=0·035). This finding included a 21% reduction in coronary revascularisation (0·79, 0·68–0·93; p=0·003). Total mortality was 6·6% in the placebo group and 7·3% in the fenofibrate group (p=0·18). Fenofibrate was associated with less albuminuria progression (p=0·002), and less retinopathy needing laser treatment (5·2% vs 3·6%, p=0·0003). There was a slight increase in pancreatitis (0·5% vs 0·8%, p=0·031) and pulmonary embolism (0·7% vs 1·1%, p=0·022), but no other significant adverse effects. Interpretation: Fenofibrate did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary outcome of coronary events. It did reduce total cardiovascular events, mainly due to fewer non-fatal myocardial infarctions and revascularisations. The higher rate of starting statin therapy in patients allocated placebo might have masked a moderately larger treatment benefit.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLancet Publishing Group
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01406736
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1849
dc.relation.ispartofpageto1861
dc.relation.ispartofissue9500
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Lancet
dc.relation.ispartofvolume366
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11
dc.titleEffects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.date.issued2014-10-10T01:55:31Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorJackson, Richard
gro.griffith.authorHamilton-Craig, Ian


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record