Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNulty, Duncanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKiley, Margareten_US
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, Noelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:33:26Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:33:26Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2011-06-06T06:01:33Z
dc.identifier.issn1469297Xen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02602930802474193en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/28506
dc.description.abstractOne issue universities face is the need to demonstrate excellence in postgraduate research supervision at the individual, faculty and university level. While poor supervision might become obvious over time, with grievances, withdrawals and poor completion times and rates, this paper focuses specifically on identifying and demonstrating supervisory excellence. Currently, the amount and range of evidence used to support claims of supervisory excellence tends to be limited, leaving supervisors, faculties and institutions in a position where demonstrating excellence remains difficult. This paper proposes two inter-dependent ideas which, considered together, help to redress this problem. The first is a 'map' for the collection and use of evidence of supervisory excellence. The second is a 'template' for a 'supervisory excellence report'. The 'map' details the organisational elements, uses of data, and data types which can be considered. The 'report' explains one simple and potent way to organise and present these data for multiple purposes. Together they constitute a much-needed framework for promoting and recognising excellence in the supervision of research students.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent260242 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom693en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto707en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue6en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume34en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation Assessment and Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode130303en_US
dc.titlePromoting and recognising excellence in the supervision of research students: an evidence-based frameworken_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Griffith Institute of Higher Educationen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2009 Routledge. This is an electronic version of an article published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 693 - 707. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com with the open URL of your article.en_AU
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record