• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Conference outputs
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Deriving a Shortlist of Brand Names: A Comparison of Measures Based on Censored Preference Data

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    30108_1.pdf (119.7Kb)
    Author(s)
    Lowe, Benjamin
    Winzar, Hume
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Winzar, Hume F.
    Lowe, Benjamin
    Year published
    2005
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The task of deriving a shortlist from a large set of potential brand names for a new product has been rarely discussed in the literature. We reject popular ratings-based methods as unreliable and ask respondents to give us their "top five". Three alternative methods of analysing these data are compared. Each involves different levels of complexity of computation and each makes different assumptions about the scale properties of the data. We learn that the simplest method works as well as the more sophisticated method, even though it makes assumptions that severely violate the data properties.The task of deriving a shortlist from a large set of potential brand names for a new product has been rarely discussed in the literature. We reject popular ratings-based methods as unreliable and ask respondents to give us their "top five". Three alternative methods of analysing these data are compared. Each involves different levels of complexity of computation and each makes different assumptions about the scale properties of the data. We learn that the simplest method works as well as the more sophisticated method, even though it makes assumptions that severely violate the data properties.
    View less >
    Conference Title
    ANZMAC 2005 Conference
    Publisher URI
    https://anzmac.wildapricot.org/
    Copyright Statement
    © The Author(s) 2005. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author(s).
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/2864
    Collection
    • Conference outputs

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander