Validity Comparison Between Asymptotic Dispersion Energy Formalisms for Nanomaterials
The asymptotic dispersion attraction between anisotropic nanostructures has recently been shown, as a general proposition, to be anomalous in metallic and near-metallic cases. In particular it is not valid to use the common procedure of adding 1/R6 energy contributions from multiple elements separated by distance R, in cases such as graphene, two-dimensional metals, and metallic nanotubes. The most commonly used version of Lifshitz theory is also unsuitable because it is adapted only to thick-slab geometry. There is a considerable choice of analytic and semi-analytic formalisms that avoid this pitfall. Examples include (i) microscopic correlation energy calculations within the Random Phase Approximation (RPA) and related methods, (ii) several types of perturbation theory, and (iii) a summation of the zero-point or thermal energies of coupled plasmons. After a brief summary of the field, the present work provides a comparative study of the validity and utility of these methods.
Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience
Copyright 2009 American Scientific Publishers. Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by American Scientific Publishers. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author for more information.
Condensed Matter Modelling and Density Functional Theory