Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPigott, J Patricken_US
dc.contributor.authorGammack, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorPigott, Diarmuiden_US
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, Valen_US
dc.contributor.editorF Burstein & R WB leeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:30:40Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2010-08-04T02:38:02Z
dc.identifier.issn03055728en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/03055720910988869en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/29402
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to describe the practical application of a reflective knowledge development lifecycle (KDLC) designed to be used by organisations reviewing their KM processes and capability. The KDLC had emerged from practical experience but had not been more widely validated. The present study seeks to provide a unique opportunity to test theory comprehensively against an exemplary case where both organisation and investigator were suited to the work.</IT> <B>Design/methodology/approach</B> - <IT>A case study research strategy was used. Applying the theory in a practical setting, an environmental scientist used the model and associated knowledge representation and visualisation tools to find gaps in processes and design in the implementation of an organisation-wide research framework.</IT> <B>Findings</B> - <IT>Developing the knowledge repository highlighted inherent complexity among people, resources, research activities, operational tasks and communication outcomes. The study helped validate the KDLC's utility in ensuring alignment of organisational processes and strategy; demonstrating its useful application in a practical setting.</IT> <B>Research limitations/implications</B> - <IT>A replication across several organisations would help to refine the model beyond this critical test in a single organisation, while suggesting further practical recommendations.</IT> <B>Originality/value</B> - <IT>The results of the study suggest that the KDLC is of value to practitioners in providing a check-list approach for knowledge auditing, to theorists developing organisational KM models and those using test-case strategies. The outcomes will particularly interest information and environmental professionals involved in establishing adaptive management projects.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom159en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto173en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue2en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalVINE The journal of information and knowledge management systemsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume39en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchInformation Systems not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode080699en_US
dc.titlePractical application of a knowledge development life cycle: Adaptive experimental management in Box-Ironbark forests of Victoriaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record