Balanced between support and strain: levels of work engagement
View/ Open
Author(s)
Timms, Carolyn
Brough, Paula
Shiels, Rosie
Year published
2009
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Work engagement has recently been identified as an important outcome of healthy work environments. Engagement of workers empowers organisations and provides them with a solid basis for sustainability and strategic planning for productivity gains. Using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) this research compared antecedents of work engagement within workers based in four countries: Australia, New Zealand, China and Hong Kong (N = 10,614). A K-means cluster analysis established five groups of like-minded participants: Highly Engaged (15%), Engaged (27%), Unengaged (30%), Disengaged (19%) and Very Disengaged (9%). The ...
View more >Work engagement has recently been identified as an important outcome of healthy work environments. Engagement of workers empowers organisations and provides them with a solid basis for sustainability and strategic planning for productivity gains. Using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) this research compared antecedents of work engagement within workers based in four countries: Australia, New Zealand, China and Hong Kong (N = 10,614). A K-means cluster analysis established five groups of like-minded participants: Highly Engaged (15%), Engaged (27%), Unengaged (30%), Disengaged (19%) and Very Disengaged (9%). The categorical engagement variable so derived was used to assess self-report levels of Work Demands, Work-life Balance, Work Family Conflict, Social Support, and Psychological Strain. Significant differences between the engagement groups were identified for all of these variables, with the largest effect sizes reflected in those variables measuring workplace relationships. In addition, significant differences across the national samples were identified. This research therefore demonstrates: (1) endorsement of previous research findings that organisations can consciously provide environments that foster employee engagement; (2) general consistency across cultural divides with some important differences.
View less >
View more >Work engagement has recently been identified as an important outcome of healthy work environments. Engagement of workers empowers organisations and provides them with a solid basis for sustainability and strategic planning for productivity gains. Using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) this research compared antecedents of work engagement within workers based in four countries: Australia, New Zealand, China and Hong Kong (N = 10,614). A K-means cluster analysis established five groups of like-minded participants: Highly Engaged (15%), Engaged (27%), Unengaged (30%), Disengaged (19%) and Very Disengaged (9%). The categorical engagement variable so derived was used to assess self-report levels of Work Demands, Work-life Balance, Work Family Conflict, Social Support, and Psychological Strain. Significant differences between the engagement groups were identified for all of these variables, with the largest effect sizes reflected in those variables measuring workplace relationships. In addition, significant differences across the national samples were identified. This research therefore demonstrates: (1) endorsement of previous research findings that organisations can consciously provide environments that foster employee engagement; (2) general consistency across cultural divides with some important differences.
View less >
Conference Title
Conference Proceedings: 8th Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference (IOP)
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2009. The attached file is posted here with permission of the copyright owners for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this conference please refer to the publisher's website or contact the authors.
Subject
Industrial and Organisational Psychology