Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiper, Scott D
dc.contributor.authorCatterall, Carla P
dc.contributor.authorKanowski, John J
dc.contributor.authorProctow, Heather C
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T11:13:19Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T11:13:19Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.modified2010-08-27T06:56:37Z
dc.identifier.issn1442-9985
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01943.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/29910
dc.description.abstractThere is growing interest in the potential for reforestation to assist the recovery of rainforest biodiversity. There is also a need to identify taxonomically tractable groups for use as cost-effective indicators when monitoring the status of biodiversity within reforested sites. Insects are an important component of terrestrial biodiversity but often require considerable resources to sample at species level. Ant genera and generic-based functional groups have been suggested as possible indicators of environmental disturbance. Here we ask to what extent the development of biodiversity is indicated by epigaeic ant genera and functional groups, across different types of reforestation in tropical and subtropical Australia. In each region, we used pitfall traps to sample the ants in replicate sites of: unmanaged regrowth, monoculture and mixed species plantations and 'ecological restoration' plantings, together with reference sites in pasture and rainforest. We recorded 35 epigaeic ant genera (and 4623 individuals) from 50 tropical sites, and 39 genera (and 9904 individuals) from 54 subtropical sites, with 47 genera overall. Community composition of both genera and functional groups differed between pasture and rainforest, although many genera were widespread in both. Reforested sites were intermediate between pasture and rainforest in both regions, and showed a gradient associated with decreasing grass and increasing tree and litter cover. Older monoculture plantations and ecological restoration plantings had the most rainforest-like ant assemblages, and mixed-species cabinet timber plots the least, of the reforested sites. We conclude that ground-active ant genera and functional groups sampled in rapid surveys by pitfall-trapping showed only a modest ability to discriminate among different types of reforestation. Species-level identification, perhaps together with expanded sampling effort, could be more informative, but would require resourcing beyond the scope of rapid assessments.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent201747 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asia
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1442-9985
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom422
dc.relation.ispartofpageto434
dc.relation.ispartofissue4
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustral Ecology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume34
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchTerrestrial ecology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode41
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode31
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode310308
dc.titleBiodiversity recovery during rainforest reforestation as indicated by rapid assessment of epigaeic ants in tropical and subtropical Australia
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environment
gro.rights.copyrightAuthor Posting. Copyright 2009. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Austral Ecology 34 (4) pp. 422-434 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01943.x
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorCatterall, Carla P.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record