Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Lexen_US
dc.contributor.authorvan Kamp, Ireneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:02:35Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:02:35Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2010-06-01T06:53:39Z
dc.identifier.issn0001-4966en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1121/1.3058636en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/29950
dc.description.abstractAnnoyance response to a change in noise exposure appears to demonstrate an excess response relative to those predicted from exposure-response curves obtained under steady-state conditions. This change effect also appears to persist well after the change. Numerous explanations have been postulated for this phenomenon. This paper catalogs the different explanations and reviews the evidence for each. The evidence is of limited and variable quality but, while inadequate to endorse any one explanation, is sufficient to reject some notions and to identify a residual set of plausible explanations. These include two explanations based on modifiers of exposure-response relationships that potentially change between before and after conditions; an explanation based on differential response criteria of respondents chronically exposed to different steady-state levels of noise; and an explanation based on retention of coping strategies All have ramifications for the assessment of human response (annoyance) where noise exposure changes, and some have wider implications for interpretation of generalized exposure-response curves obtained in the steady state.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent231528 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherAIP Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom905en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto914en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue2en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of Americaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume125en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchTransport Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBuilt Environment and Design not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode090507en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode129999en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode170199en_US
dc.titleResponse to a change in transport noise exposure: Competing explanations of change effectsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2009. Acoustical Society of America. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.en_AU
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record