Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCreedy, Debraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGamble, Jenniferen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T17:39:58Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T17:39:58Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.date.modified2013-07-31T00:05:53Z
dc.identifier.issn1523-536Xen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046%2Fj.1523-536x.2000.00256.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/3028
dc.description.abstractBackground: The consistently high cesarean section rate in most developed Western countries has been attributed in part to maternal request. This controversial view demands critical analysis. This paper provides a critique of published research relating to women's request for cesarean delivery. Method: A search of the major databases was undertaken using the search term "cesarean section" with "maternal request,""decision-making,""patient-participation,""decision-making-patient,""patient-satisfaction,""patient-preference," and "maternal-choice." Ten research articles examining women's preferred mode of birth were retrieved, nine of which focused on women's preference for cesarean delivery. Results: The methodology of some studies may result in overreporting women's request for a cesarean delivery. The role of the woman's caregiver in the generation, collection, and entry of data, and the occurrence of post hoc rationalization, recall bias, and women's tendency to be less critical of their care immediately after birth are possible areas of concern. Due consideration is rarely given to the influence of obstetric risk for women who may be requesting a cesarean section or to the information women used in making their decision. Women's perceptions of their involvement in decision-making regarding cesarean section are used to draw conclusions regarding women's request. Conclusions: Few women request a cesarean section in the absence of current or previous obstetric complications. The focus on women's request for cesarean section may divert attention away from physician-led influences on the continuing high cesarean section rates.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUSAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom256en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto263en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBirth: Issues in Perinatal Careen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume27en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode320000en_US
dc.titleWomen's request for a cesarean section: A critique of the literatureen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
gro.date.issued2000
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record