dc.contributor.author | Glass, Robert L | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-30T12:30:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-30T12:30:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.modified | 2010-08-06T07:22:28Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0740-7459 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/MS.2009.126 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/31447 | |
dc.description.abstract | Software standards. Now there's a subject that brooks no "loyal opposition," right? Standards are material provided by some software god, biblically significant, subject to no doubt? In recent years I've come to question all that.In 2006, my colleague Johann Rost wrote a guest Loyal Opposition column on the standard for requirements documents. He explained that at the conceptual level he understood the standard quite well, but at the implementation level he found it impossible to follow. I offered him sympathy, hosted his column here, and sort of forgot about it. Time passed. Another colleague, Barbara Kitchenham, was beginning to struggle with certain software standards. One standard gave "inappropriate advice for measuring software engineering processes." Another standard was "not suitable for measuring the design quality of a software product." Echoing Johann's concerns, Barbara commented that "experienced designers will be able to construct a number of different interpretations of the standard, implying that [it] is not a standard at all." Barbara pointed me at yet another critic of software standards, Magne Jorgensen. He noted that one standard for software quality "requires quality measurement and at the same time admits that there are no (universally) accepted quality measures". | |
dc.description.publicationstatus | Yes | |
dc.format.extent | 1725221 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | IEEE | |
dc.publisher.place | United States | |
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublication | N | |
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom | 103 | |
dc.relation.ispartofpageto | 104 | |
dc.relation.ispartofissue | 5 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | IEEE Software | |
dc.relation.ispartofvolume | 26 | |
dc.rights.retention | Y | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Software engineering not elsewhere classified | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Information systems | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 461299 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 4609 | |
dc.title | Doubt and software standards | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C3 - Articles (Letter/ Note) | |
dc.type.code | C - Journal Articles | |
gro.faculty | Griffith Sciences, School of Information and Communication Technology | |
gro.rights.copyright | © 2009 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from IEEE. | |
gro.date.issued | 2009 | |
gro.hasfulltext | Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Glass, Robert L. | |