Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWood, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNos, Julieen_US
dc.contributor.authorGullo, Matthewen_US
dc.contributor.authorDawe, Sharonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:07:01Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:07:01Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.modified2010-07-09T03:06:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/31646
dc.description.abstractObjective: Participation in prosocial risk taking activities and a healthy family environment have been thought to serve as protective factors, while a personality characterized by impulsivity, has been found to convey risk, for adolescent substance use. Recent conceptualizations of impulsivity propose reward drive and rash impulsivity, are differentially associated with substance use. This study tested a model predicting participation in prosocial risk taking activities (extreme activities and performance activities) would moderate the relationship between rash impulsivity, reward drive, and substance use. A healthy family environment was expected to serve as a protective factor. Method: To investigate these relationships, survey data from a sample of 1060 Grade 8 students was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: As expected, rash impulsivity was found to have a significant, positive association with substance use in females, and a similar non-significant trend was found for males. Unexpectedly, participation in extreme activities was actually associated with greater substance use in males and females. Furthermore, reward drive was indirectly associated with substance use through increased participation in extreme activities. Testing for moderation effects revealed neither extreme nor performance activities modulated the effect of impulsivity on substance use, for males or females. However, there was a significant interaction suggesting that a positive family environment was associated with lower substance use in girls, but only for those who were engaged in performance activities. Conclusions: Prosocial risk taking does not appear to modulate the effect of rash impulsivity on substance use. In fact, reward drive conveys risk for substance use, indirectly, through participation in extreme activities, which was associated with substance use.en_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename32nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholismen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2009-06-20en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2009-06-24en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationSan Diego, California, United Statesen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchDevelopmental Psychology and Ageingen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth, Clinical and Counselling Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode170102en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode170106en_US
dc.titleThe relationship between impulsivity, prosocial risk taking and substance use in adolescentsen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conference Publications (Extract Paper)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record