Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHitchcock, Mareeen_US
dc.contributor.authorCrilly, Juliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Brigiden_US
dc.contributor.authorChaboyer, Wendyen_US
dc.contributor.authorTippett, Vivienneen_US
dc.contributor.authorLind, Jamesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:51:33Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:51:33Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.modified2010-09-21T06:56:24Z
dc.identifier.issn15746267en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aenj.2010.02.004en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/32204
dc.description.abstractBackground Ambulance ramping within the Emergency Department (ED) is a common problem both internationally and in Australia. Previous research has focused on various issues associated with ambulance ramping such as access block, ED overcrowding and ambulance bypass. However, limited research has been conducted on ambulance ramping and its effects on patient outcomes. Methods A case-control design was used to describe, compare and predict patient outcomes of 619 ramped (cases) vs. 1238 non-ramped (control) patients arriving to one ED via ambulance from 1 June 2007 to 31 August 2007. Cases and controls were matched (on a 1:2 basis) on age, gender and presenting problem. Outcome measures included ED length of stay and in-hospital mortality. Results The median ramp time for all 1857 patients was 11 (IQR 6-21) min. Compared to non-ramped patients, ramped patients had significantly longer wait time to be triaged (10 min vs. 4 min). Ramped patients also comprised significantly higher proportions of those access blocked (43% vs. 34%). No significant difference in the proportion of in-hospital deaths was identified (2% vs. 3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the likelihood of having an ED length of stay greater than eight hours was 34% higher among patients who were ramped (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.70, p = 0.014). In relation to in-hospital mortality age was the only significant independent predictor of mortality (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Ambulance ramping is one factor that contributes to prolonged ED length of stay and adds additional strain on ED service provision. The potential for adverse patient outcomes that may occur as a result of ramping warrants close attention by health care service providers. Keywords: Ambulance ramping; Emergency Department; Outcomes; Prehospitalen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationYen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom17en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto24en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1-2en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralasian Emergency Nursing Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume13en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111003en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode119999en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111799en_US
dc.titleThe effects of ambulance ramping on Emergency Department length of stay and in-patient mortalityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Nursing and Midwiferyen_US
gro.date.issued2010
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record