Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLow Choy, Darrylen_US
dc.contributor.editorPatrick Troyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T14:33:28Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T14:33:28Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2010-07-19T04:42:40Z
dc.identifier.refuriwww.griffith.edu.au/conferences/soac2005en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/32377
dc.description.abstractA region can be distinguished by the diversity of landscapes that make-up that region, its degree of liveability and the elements that contribute to its liveability. These positive attributes of open space within a region can only be realised through the coherent and integrated form of a regional landscape framework. There have been a number of attempts to achieve a consolidated landscape framework in the past for the Brisbane City metropolitan region as well as for the South East Queensland region. On all occasions these regional scale initiatives were in response to rapidly changing growth pressures but most met with limited success or failed. Hence, it would be informative to establish if the lessons from these past initiatives had any relevance for the recent SEQ Regional Planning initiatives of the Queensland State Government and the region's local governments. This paper has reviewed the principal attempts to address regional landscape and open space initiatives for the City and region in the past. The history of these attempts strongly demonstrates that community engagement through collaborative planning is the only feasible landscape management paradigm capable of successfully addressing the urban growth challenges facing South East Queensland and safeguarding its regional landscape values in their entirety. It has also been clearly demonstrated that it will be imperative to relate and address the regional landscape elements and values in the holistic context of a landscape framework. Additionally, this framework should be supported by collaborative institutional mechanisms in order to ensure the coordinated implementation of the concepts, policies and proposals. Whilst it appears that the new SEQ Regional Plan 2005-2026 and its implementation processes may provide a foundation for this to occur it is still by no means sure if the recently conferred statutory nature of the new Regional Plan will result in different outcomes to previous planning endeavours and whether these outcomes can take advantage of the lessons from the past.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherUrban Research Program, Griffith Universityen_US
dc.publisher.placeNathan, Queenslanden_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/state-australian-cities-2005en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename2nd State of Australian Cities Conference: The Sustainability and Vulnerability of Urban Australiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleSOAC 2005 - refereed proceedings.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2005-11-30en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2005-12-02en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbaneen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode310103en_US
dc.titleHow Green Was My City Region: The relevance of past open space planning experiences to contemporary planing for the Brisbane metropolitan regionen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record