Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorNoel Frankhamen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWoodrow, Rossen_US
dc.contributor.editorNoel Frankhamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:22:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:22:38Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.modified2010-08-03T09:04:13Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/32940
dc.description.abstractIn Visual Ephemera (2000), Anita Callaway makes the assertion that our non-indigenous cultural beginnings in the nineteenth century will be found in the often transient popular arts, rather than in a fruitless search for great oil paintings to compete against the European High-Art paradigm. In this paper I will extend the scope of Callaway's study to encompass the field of popular illustration and cartooning. My analysis draws from the graphic production of the most prolific image maker in nineteenth century Australia, Montagu Scott (1835 - 1909). In particular, I make a comparison of his illustrated work of the 1860s with examples produced by him in the 1890s. The theme I will explore is as topical as it ever was - the relationship between Australia and Britain as it is made manifest by Australian attitudes to the British Monarch or her representative in Australia. Since an examination of this relationship is essentially a chronicle of the construction of an Australian identity distinct from Europe, other sub-texts naturally emerge, including the use made by Anglo-Australians of their ideas about, and images of, indigenous Australians. Even though my examples are restricted to a dozen images, I intend these to characterize the richness of the data in popular graphic discourse. By implication this paper also presents a model, if not methodology, for extraction of ideological significance from popular images.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherAustralian Council of University Art and Design Schoolsen_US
dc.publisher.placeHobart, University of Tasmaniaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.acuads.com.au/en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofbookorjournalACUADS Survey: Current art and design research and practiceen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameACUADS Survey: Current art and design research and practice within Aust tertiary art&design schoolsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleACUADS Survey: Current art and design research and practiceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2003-10-01en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2003-10-04en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationUnversity of Tasmaniaen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode410202en_US
dc.titleQueen Victoria versus "King Billy": Images as Historyen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.date.issued2003
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record