Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEngland, Philippa
dc.description.abstractIn 1998, Gunningham and Grabosky argued the case for a regulatory mix to be applied in the area of biodiversity conservation. Since their work was published, land clearing legislation, conservation covenants and ecosystem markets, have all played a growing role in biodiversity conservation in Australia. This article examines how well these developments contribute, individually and together, to an optimal regulatory mix for biodiversity conservation in Australia. It argues that, over the past two decades, what has transpired is a classic case of ‘divergent logics’ in which different regulatory tools often work in isolation or against each other. These divergent regulatory logics need to be addressed in order to move policy forward and to optimise the value of ecosystem markets. Some recent regulatory analyses help to identify the work still to be done.
dc.publisherMacquarie University
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Journal of Environmental Law
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw and Legal Studies not elsewhere classified
dc.titleBetween Regulation and Markets: Ironies and Anomalies in the Regulatory Governance of Biodiversity Conservation in Australia
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Law
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorEngland, Philippa C.

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record