Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeters, Susan E
dc.contributor.authorCoppieters, Michel W
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Mark
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Venerina
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T00:55:08Z
dc.date.available2017-06-13T00:55:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1053-0487
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10926-016-9662-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/339707
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Return-to-work (RTW) stakeholders have varied roles and may therefore hold their own perspectives regarding factors that may influence outcomes. This study aimed to determine stakeholders’ perspectives on factors influencing RTW following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to RTW stakeholders via gatekeeper organizations. Stakeholders rated 50 potential prognostic factors from ‘not’ to ‘extremely’ influential. Data were dichotomized to establish stakeholders’ level of agreement. Disagreements between stakeholder groups were analyzed using χ2. The relationship between stakeholder demographic variables and rating of a factor was determined via regression analysis. Results: One thousand and eleven stakeholders completed the survey: healthcare providers (77.8 %); employer representatives (12.2 %); insurer representatives (6.8 %); and lawyers (3.2 %). Factors with the highest stakeholder agreement for influencing RTW were: self-efficacy (92.2 %); post-operative psychological status (91.8 %); supportive employer/supervisor (91.4 %); employer’s willingness to accommodate job modifications (90.7 %); worker’s recovery expectations (88.3 %); mood disorder diagnosis (86.6 %); post-operative pain level (86.4 %); and whether the job can be modified (86.3 %). Disagreements between stakeholder groups were found for 19 (36 %) factors. The strongest disagreements were for: age; gender; obesity; doctor’s RTW recommendation; and presence of a RTW coordinator. Respondents’ characteristics (e.g., age, workers’ compensation jurisdiction, work experience, stakeholder group) were associated with factor rating. Conclusion: The factors stakeholders rated as having the greatest influence on RTW were predominately psychosocial and modifiable. These variables should be the focus of future research to determine prognostic factors for RTW for workers with upper extremity conditions, and to develop effective RTW interventions.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto16
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode320299
dc.titlePerspectives from Employers, Insurers, Lawyers and Healthcare Providers on Factors that Influence Workers' Return-to-Work Following Surgery for Non-Traumatic Upper Extremity Conditions
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCoppieters, Michel


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record