Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoppieters, Michel W
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Line S
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Runar
dc.contributor.authorGiskegjerde, Per K
dc.contributor.authorHoivik, Mona
dc.contributor.authorVestre, Siv
dc.contributor.authorNee, Robert J
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T03:24:24Z
dc.date.available2017-06-13T03:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0190-6011
dc.identifier.doi10.2519/jospt.2015.5743
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/339759
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: Controlled laboratory cross-sectional study using single-group, within-subject comparisons. Objectives: To determine whether different types of neurodynamic techniques result in differences in longitudinal sciatic nerve excursion. Background: Large differences in nerve biomechanics have been demonstratedfor different neurodynamic techniques for the upper limb (median nerve), but recent findings for the sciatic nerve have only revealed small differences in nerve excursion that may not be clinically meaningful. Methods: High-resolution ultrasound imaging was used to quantify longitudinal sciatic nerve movement in the thigh of 15 asymptomatic participants during 6 different mobilization techniques for the sciatic nerve involving the hip and knee. Healthy volunteers were selected to demonstrate normal nerve biomechanics and to eliminate potentially confounding variables associated with dysfunction. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to analyze the data. Results: The techniques resulted in markedly different amounts of nerve movement (P<.001). The tensioning technique was associated with the smallest excursion (mean ± SD, 3.2 ± 2.1 mm; P−.004). The sliding technique resulted in the largest excursion (mean ± SD, 17.0 ± 5.2 mm; P<.001), which was approximately 5 times larger than that resulting from the tensioning technique and, on average, twice as large as that resulting from individual hip or knee movements. Conclusion: Consistent with current theories and findings for the median nerve, different neurodynamic exercises for the lower limb resulted in markedly different sciatic nerve excursions. Considering the continuity of the nervous system, the movement and position of adjacent joints have a large impact on nerve biomechanics.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOrthopaedic Section and the Sports Physical Therapy Section of the American Physical Therapy Associa
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom731
dc.relation.ispartofpageto737
dc.relation.ispartofissue10
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
dc.relation.ispartofvolume45
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode320299
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4207
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode420799
dc.titleExcursion of the sciatic nerve during nerve mobilization exercises: An in vivo cross-sectional study using dynamic ultrasound imaging
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.rights.copyrightSelf-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this journal. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author[s] for more information.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCoppieters, Michel


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record