Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNee, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorJull, Gwendolen A
dc.contributor.authorVicenzino, Bill
dc.contributor.authorCoppieters, Michel W
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T03:39:32Z
dc.date.available2017-06-13T03:39:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0190-6011
dc.identifier.doi10.2519/jospt.2012.3988
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/339770
dc.description.abstractSynopsis The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests (ULNTs) for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) was assessed by reviewing the evidence on plausibility, the definition of a positive test, reliability, and concurrent validity. Evidence was identified by a structured search for peer-reviewed articles published in English before May 2011. The quality of concurrent validity studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, where appropriate. Biomechanical and experimental pain data support the plausibility of ULNTs. Evidence suggests that a positive ULNT should at least partially reproduce the patient's symptoms and that structural differentiation should change these symptoms. Data indicate that this definition of a positive ULNT is reliable when used clinically. Limited evidence suggests that the median nerve test, but not the radial nerve test, helps determine whether a patient has cervical radiculopathy. The median nerve test does not help diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, because diagnostic accuracy might have been distorted by the investigators' definitions of a positive ULNT. Furthermore, patients with PNP who presented with increased nerve mechanosensitivity rather than conduction loss might have been incorrectly classified by electrophysiological reference standards as not having PNP. The only evidence for concurrent validity of the ulnar nerve test was a case study on cubital tunnel syndrome. We recommend that researchers develop more comprehensive reference standards for PNP to accurately assess the concurrent validity of ULNTs and continue investigating the predictive validity of ULNTs for prognosis or treatment response.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOrthopaedic Section and the Sports Physical Therapy Section of the American Physical Therapy Associa
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom413
dc.relation.ispartofpageto424
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
dc.relation.ispartofvolume42
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3202
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode320299
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4207
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode420799
dc.titleThe validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.rights.copyrightSelf-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this journal. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author[s] for more information.
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCoppieters, Michel


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record