Researching the teaching of subject English: Socio-cultural theories and methods

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Exley, Beryl
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
I come to this article as an experienced primary and middle years teacher and midcareer
university-based academic with a vested interest in researching the message systems of the
disciplinary field of subject English. My sociocultural perspective challenges those who view English
teaching predominantly as a cognitive act of learning to read or write, or shy away from introducing
content that feels raw or political. In the eloquent words of Shiqing (2014), I ‘reject the idealised
view of truth inherited from the ancients and replace it with a dynamic, changing trust bounded by
time, space and perspective’ (p. 70). Empirically, ...
View more >I come to this article as an experienced primary and middle years teacher and midcareer university-based academic with a vested interest in researching the message systems of the disciplinary field of subject English. My sociocultural perspective challenges those who view English teaching predominantly as a cognitive act of learning to read or write, or shy away from introducing content that feels raw or political. In the eloquent words of Shiqing (2014), I ‘reject the idealised view of truth inherited from the ancients and replace it with a dynamic, changing trust bounded by time, space and perspective’ (p. 70). Empirically, in my work as a primary and middle years English teacher, I am influenced by two major theories associated with language as a socio-cultural resource: Multiliteracies Pedagogies (New London Group, 2000) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004). Theoretically, in my work as a researcher, I draw on sociological understandings of the three message systems of education, that is, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Bernstein, 2000), to describe the effects of adopting these stringent socio-cultural approaches. In that article which follows, I introduce and discuss the influences of multiliteracies pedagogies, systemic functional linguistics and sociological theories in turn.
View less >
View more >I come to this article as an experienced primary and middle years teacher and midcareer university-based academic with a vested interest in researching the message systems of the disciplinary field of subject English. My sociocultural perspective challenges those who view English teaching predominantly as a cognitive act of learning to read or write, or shy away from introducing content that feels raw or political. In the eloquent words of Shiqing (2014), I ‘reject the idealised view of truth inherited from the ancients and replace it with a dynamic, changing trust bounded by time, space and perspective’ (p. 70). Empirically, in my work as a primary and middle years English teacher, I am influenced by two major theories associated with language as a socio-cultural resource: Multiliteracies Pedagogies (New London Group, 2000) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004). Theoretically, in my work as a researcher, I draw on sociological understandings of the three message systems of education, that is, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Bernstein, 2000), to describe the effects of adopting these stringent socio-cultural approaches. In that article which follows, I introduce and discuss the influences of multiliteracies pedagogies, systemic functional linguistics and sociological theories in turn.
View less >
Journal Title
English in Australia
Volume
50
Issue
3
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2015. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author[s].
Subject
Curriculum and pedagogy
English and literacy curriculum and pedagogy (excl. LOTE, ESL and TESOL)
Language studies