Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSweeting, Kenten_US
dc.contributor.authorWhitty, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorScuffham, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorYelland, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:55:32Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:55:32Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2013-05-29T03:47:45Z
dc.identifier.issn11781653en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2165/11532830-000000000-00000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/34044
dc.description.abstractBackground: Discrete-choice experiments are based on the premise that any good or service can be described by its characteristics (or attributes), and the extent to which an individual values a good or service depends on the levels of these characteristics. Little is known about patient preferences for treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain such as Achilles tendinopathy. Methods: A discrete-choice experiment was conducted in 58 adults with a history of Achilles tendon pain at the conclusion of a three-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of ten hypothetical treatment scenarios and some sociodemographic questions. For each scenario, participants were asked to choose which option they would prefer if seeking treatment for their painful Achilles tendon. A mixed logit model was estimated to quantify subject preferences and marginal willingness to pay for the treatment attributes. Results: A response rate of 62% was achieved. A significant positive impact on utility was observed for chance of treatment success. A significant negative impact on utility was observed for cost, weeks before exercise can be completed free of pain, chance of side effects (p = 0.06), and injections as a stand-alone treatment. Respondents were willing to pay Australian dollars ($A)238 (95% CI -312, 788) for a 10% increase in the chance of treatment success. Conclusions: Study participants with Achilles tendon pain who had either participated or expressed an interest in participating in a randomized trial prefer a treatment that costs less, has a greater chance of success, has a shorter duration before being able to exercise free of pain, and has less likelihood of side effects. On average, participants preferred exercises over injections as a stand-alone treatment. Further research is required to confirm the findings in patients outside of the trial setting. Nevertheless, this study contributes to an area that is deficient in research by identifying priorities and marginal willingness to pay for attributes related to Achilles tendinopathy.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherADIS International Ltd.en_US
dc.publisher.placeNew Zealanden_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom45en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto54en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume4en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth and Community Servicesen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111708en_US
dc.titlePatient Preferences for Treatment of Achilles Tendon Pain: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experimenten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Medicineen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2010 Adis Data Information BV. Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this publisher. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the authors for more information.en_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record