• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Access to Legal Representation by Criminal Defendants in Victoria, 1861-1961

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    PIPERPUB3410.pdf (924.7Kb)
    File version
    Version of Record (VoR)
    Author(s)
    Piper, Alana
    Finnane, Mark
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Finnane, Mark J.
    Year published
    2017
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Traditionally under the English legal system, prisoners charged with felonies had been denied the right to legal representation on the grounds that such assistance was superfluous, perhaps even harmful to the cause of justice.1 Jurist William Hawkins, writing in the early 18th century, declared that ‘it requires no manner of Skill to make a plain and honest Defence’, adding that the ‘artless and ingenuous Behaviour of one whose Conscience acquits him’ had ‘something in it more moving and convincing than the highest Eloquence of Persons speaking in a Cause not their own’.2 However, it was also from the early 18th century that ...
    View more >
    Traditionally under the English legal system, prisoners charged with felonies had been denied the right to legal representation on the grounds that such assistance was superfluous, perhaps even harmful to the cause of justice.1 Jurist William Hawkins, writing in the early 18th century, declared that ‘it requires no manner of Skill to make a plain and honest Defence’, adding that the ‘artless and ingenuous Behaviour of one whose Conscience acquits him’ had ‘something in it more moving and convincing than the highest Eloquence of Persons speaking in a Cause not their own’.2 However, it was also from the early 18th century that defence counsel were gradually allowed to take part in the trials of those charged with serious crimes. Much has been written on how this fundamentally changed the nature of the criminal trial process in jurisdictions derived from the common law system, as we discuss later.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    University of New South Wales Law Journal
    Volume
    40
    Issue
    2
    Publisher URI
    http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/news/
    Copyright Statement
    © 2017 University of New South Wales. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Use hypertext link to access the journal's website.
    Subject
    Criminology
    Australian history
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/340488
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E
    • TEQSA: PRV12076

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander