Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu, Rongrong
dc.contributor.authorGero, John S.
dc.contributor.editorAmaresh Chakrabarti, Debkumar Chakrabarti
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-26T23:56:10Z
dc.date.available2017-06-26T23:56:10Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_40
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/340772
dc.description.abstractDo different representations of space evoke the same response in viewers? This paper reports on a pilot study exploring designers’ cognitive load as they view different digital representation of spaces to determine the effect of the representations. The results reported in this paper are from a group of year 3 and year 4 architecture students from Harbin Institute of Technology in China who participated in the experiment. The two representational modalities in this study that participants were asked to view were a computer-generated hidden-line perspective and a digital photograph of the same space. Their physiological data were recorded by eye-tracking equipment, including participants’ eye gaze trace location and pupil size. The same seven Area of Interests (AOI) were defined in each of the two representations. Results show statistically significant cognitive load change when the AOI focused on changes. The cognitive loads for the two representations were found not to be significantly different.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisher.placeSingapore
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameICoRD 2017
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleResearch into Design for Communities, Volume 1 & 2, Proceedings of ICoRD 2017
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2017-01-09
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2017-01-11
dc.relation.ispartoflocationGuwahati, India
dc.subject.fieldofresearchArchitecture not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode330199
dc.titleExploring designers' cognitive load when viewing different digital representations of spaces: A pilot study
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conferences
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publications
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environment
gro.rights.copyright© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorYu, Rongrong


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record