Adherence to evidence-based pressure injury prevention guidelines in routine clinical practice: A longitudinal study
Embargoed until: 2018-07-01
MetadataShow full item record
The aim of this longitudinal study was to describe adherence to evidence-based pressure injury (PI) prevention guidelines in routine clinical practice in Australian hospitals. Data were analysed from four control sites of a larger-cluster randomised trial of a PI intervention. The sample of 799 included 220 (27·5%) Not at risk, 344 (43·1%) At risk and 110 (13·8%) At high risk patients. A total of 84 (10·5%) patients developed a PI during the study: 20 (9·0% of 220) in the Not at risk group, 45 (13·1% of 344) in the At risk group, 15 (13·6% of 110) in the At high risk group and 4 (3·2% of 125) patients who did not have a risk assessment completed. Of all patients, 165 (20·7%) received only one PI prevention strategy, and 494 (61·8%) received ≥2 strategies at some point during the study period. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of time the three risk groups received ≥1 and ≥2 strategies; on average, this was less than half the time they were in the study. Thus, patients were not receiving PI prevention strategies consistently throughout their hospital stay, although it is possible patients' risk changed over the study period.
International Wound Journal
Copyright 2017John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Adherence to evidence-based pressure injury prevention guidelines in routine clinical practice: a longitudinal study, International Wound Journal, pp. 1-9, 2017, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/iwj.12798. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving (http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html)
This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified