Contrast microsphere enhancement of the tricuspid regurgitant spectral Doppler signal - Is it still necessary with contemporary scanners?
View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Platts, David G
Vaishnav, Manan
Burstowa, Darryl J
Craig, Christian Hamilton
Chan, Jonathan
Sedgwick, John F
Scalia, Gregory M
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2017
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Accurate evaluation of the tricuspid regurgitant (TR) spectral Doppler signal is important during
transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation for pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Contrast enhancement improves
Doppler backscatter. However, its incremental benefit with contemporary scanners is less well
established. The aim of this study was to assess whether the TR spectral Doppler signal using contemporary scanners
was improved using a second generation contrast agent, Definity® (CE), compared to unenhanced TTE (UE).
Methods: Analysis of patients who underwent UE then CE TR interrogation was performed. TR signal ...
View more >Background: Accurate evaluation of the tricuspid regurgitant (TR) spectral Doppler signal is important during transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation for pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Contrast enhancement improves Doppler backscatter. However, its incremental benefit with contemporary scanners is less well established. The aim of this study was to assess whether the TR spectral Doppler signal using contemporary scanners was improved using a second generation contrast agent, Definity® (CE), compared to unenhanced TTE (UE). Methods: Analysis of patients who underwent UE then CE TR interrogation was performed. TR signal was evaluated by an experienced reader and graded 1 (clear-high level of confidence of interpretation and complete spectral Doppler envelope), 2 (suboptimal with medium-low level of confidence of interpretation and incomplete envelope), 3 (poor-absent and no measurable spectral Doppler signal). Maximal TR velocity (TRV) was defined as peak velocity that could be clearly identified. An inexperienced sonographer read 30 randomly selected studies. Results: 176 TTE were performed in 173 patients (mean age 57 ± 14.8 years). Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated significant improvement (p b 0.0001) in TR spectral Doppler signal quality with CE TTE. Mean score CE TTE vs. TTE = 2.32 ± 0.85 vs. 2.56 ± 0.75 respectively (p b 0.0001). Mean maximal TRV CE TTE vs. UE TTE = 2.61 ± 0.44 m/s vs. 2.54 ± 0.49 m/s respectively (p b 0.0001). The inexperienced reader had a greater improvement in scoring CE TTE signals vs. UE TTE (p b 0.0001). Conclusion: In the era of contemporary scanners, CE improved the ability to detect and measure TRV, except in those with clear unenhanced TR spectral Doppler signals or greater than mild tricuspid regurgitation
View less >
View more >Background: Accurate evaluation of the tricuspid regurgitant (TR) spectral Doppler signal is important during transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation for pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Contrast enhancement improves Doppler backscatter. However, its incremental benefit with contemporary scanners is less well established. The aim of this study was to assess whether the TR spectral Doppler signal using contemporary scanners was improved using a second generation contrast agent, Definity® (CE), compared to unenhanced TTE (UE). Methods: Analysis of patients who underwent UE then CE TR interrogation was performed. TR signal was evaluated by an experienced reader and graded 1 (clear-high level of confidence of interpretation and complete spectral Doppler envelope), 2 (suboptimal with medium-low level of confidence of interpretation and incomplete envelope), 3 (poor-absent and no measurable spectral Doppler signal). Maximal TR velocity (TRV) was defined as peak velocity that could be clearly identified. An inexperienced sonographer read 30 randomly selected studies. Results: 176 TTE were performed in 173 patients (mean age 57 ± 14.8 years). Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated significant improvement (p b 0.0001) in TR spectral Doppler signal quality with CE TTE. Mean score CE TTE vs. TTE = 2.32 ± 0.85 vs. 2.56 ± 0.75 respectively (p b 0.0001). Mean maximal TRV CE TTE vs. UE TTE = 2.61 ± 0.44 m/s vs. 2.54 ± 0.49 m/s respectively (p b 0.0001). The inexperienced reader had a greater improvement in scoring CE TTE signals vs. UE TTE (p b 0.0001). Conclusion: In the era of contemporary scanners, CE improved the ability to detect and measure TRV, except in those with clear unenhanced TR spectral Doppler signals or greater than mild tricuspid regurgitation
View less >
Journal Title
International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature
Volume
17
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Subject
Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases)