• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • An Application of the Principles of Projectile Motion to a Homicide Investigation

    Author(s)
    Barrett, Rod
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Barrett, Rod
    Year published
    2010
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Biomechanics testimony was sought to assess the feasibility of a claim made by the defendant that a fatal head injury sustained by the victim arose as a result of the defendant throwing a child's bicycle a horizontal distance of 7 m which accidentally struck the victim. The method of projection was claimed to involve pushing the bicycle from the chest equally with both hands from a stationary upright standing position in a manner similar to a chest pass in basketball. A further consideration in the case was that the maximum height of the projectile during flight was constrained by the presence of an overhead ceiling. Using ...
    View more >
    Biomechanics testimony was sought to assess the feasibility of a claim made by the defendant that a fatal head injury sustained by the victim arose as a result of the defendant throwing a child's bicycle a horizontal distance of 7 m which accidentally struck the victim. The method of projection was claimed to involve pushing the bicycle from the chest equally with both hands from a stationary upright standing position in a manner similar to a chest pass in basketball. A further consideration in the case was that the maximum height of the projectile during flight was constrained by the presence of an overhead ceiling. Using equations for uniform motion and based on measurements made at the crime scene, it was determined that the theoretical release speed of the projectile could not have been less than 10.0-11.0 m/s and was probably closer to 14 m/s. These estimated release speeds are substantially higher than the release speeds associated with a comparable movement pattern, namely, the maximal two-handed bench throw (~2.5 m/s), and instead approximate the release speeds recorded by the best three throwers in the Men's Shot Put at the 2004 Athens Olympic Games (13.60-13.95 m/s). It therefore seems highly unlikely that the defendant could have thrown the projectile a horizontal distance of 7 m as claimed.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Journal of Forensic Biomechanics
    Volume
    1
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.4303/jfb/F100301
    Subject
    Biomechanics
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/35450
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander