Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarding, Jasonen_US
dc.contributor.authorToohey, Kristineen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Martin, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Hahn, Allanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.editorMargaret Estivalet and Pierre Brissonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T09:21:22Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T09:21:22Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.modified2011-02-16T09:50:34Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-2-287-99056-4_57en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/36330
dc.description.abstractAutomated and objective information specific to half-pipe snowboarding has now been made available with micro-technology and signal processing techniques. In consultation with the practice community this has been introduced into training and competition in Australia. It is understood that any integration of technology into elite sport can effect change beyond the original purpose and can often generate unintended consequences. We have therefore evaluated the perceptions of key members of the elite half-pipe snowboard community in regards to how emerging technology could interface with the sport. Data were collected via semi-structured, open ended interviews with 16 international, elite-level half-pipe snowboard competition judges. This study revealed 8 dimensions and 42 sub-dimensions related to the community's perceptions to 5 major themes that emerged during interviews. The major themes included: 1. Snowboarding's Underlying Cultural Ethos 2. Snowboarding's Underlying Self-Annihilating Teleology 3. Technological Objectivity 4. Concept Management 5. Coveted Future Directions. There was dominant perception that an underlying self-annihilating teleology could exist within competitive half-pipe snowboarding. This was believed however to pose a distant threat on judging protocols to reliably assess performance. Judges sampled in this study were largely in favour of using automated objectivity to enhance the judging process however, with a number of caveats. Most importantly that objective information is to be used as a judging aid and not for automatic generation of scores. This would address the most prevalent concern that integrating any automated objectivity into snowboarding could potentially remove freedom of expression and the opportunity to showcase athletic individuality - traits valued by the practice community. Our data highlight that successful implementation of emerging technologies in sport will be not be based on the type of technology developed but instead by the integration process which must feature a large element of control imparted to the key players within the sport.en_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisher.placeParisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencename7th Conference Of The International Sport Engineering Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleThe Engineering of Sport 7. Vol. 2en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2008-06-02en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2008-06-06en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBiarritz, Franceen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHuman Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110699en_US
dc.titleTechnology And Half-Pipe Snowboard Competition - Insight From Elite-Level Judges (P240)en_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE3 - Conference Publications (Extract Paper)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel Managementen_US
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record