Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdjemian, R
dc.contributor.authorZirkohi, AM
dc.contributor.authorCoombs, R
dc.contributor.authorMickan, S
dc.contributor.authorVaillancourt, C
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-28T12:30:27Z
dc.date.available2018-02-28T12:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2053-4345
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2053434517707971
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/364275
dc.description.abstractBackground Heterogeneity in both the definition and terminology of clinical pathways presents a challenge to the systematic identification of primary studies for review purposes. Recently developed clinical pathway identification criteria may facilitate both the identification and assessment of clinical pathway studies. The goal of this publication is the validation of these five criteria in a descriptive systematic review of actively implemented clinical pathway studies in the emergency department setting. The main outcome measure is the inter-rater agreement of investigators using the clinical pathway criteria. Methods We performed a systematic literature search from 2006 to 2015 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL. All types of prospective trial designs were eligible. We identified relevant publications using the above-mentioned clinical pathway criteria. Two reviewers independently collected data using a piloted data abstraction tool. Results We identified 5947 publications, with 472 potentially relevant full text publications retrieved. Of these, 357 did not meet preliminary study inclusion criteria, leaving 115 publications where the clinical pathway criteria were applied. Ultimately, 44 publications were included. The inter-rater agreement of the criteria was very good (κ = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.70–0.92). The vast majority of studies were excluded because the intervention did not meet the criterion of being multidisciplinary in nature. Conclusion These criteria are a useful instrument to reliably identify clinical pathway publications for systematic review purposes in an emergency department setting. Future modification of these criteria may improve their usefulness. Particular attention should be placed on clarifying what is meant by multidisciplinary involvement within the context of clinical pathway interventions, with specific emphasis placed on delineating the level of involvement of each discipline and their decision-making responsibility.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom45
dc.relation.ispartofpageto56
dc.relation.ispartofissue1-2
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Care Coordination
dc.relation.ispartofvolume20
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOther biomedical and clinical sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchOther health sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode329999
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode429999
dc.titleValidation of descriptive clinical pathway criteria in the systematic identification of publications in emergency medicine
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMickan, Sharon M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record