SHRM Theory in the Post-Huselid Era: Why It Is Fundamentally Misspecified
This article critiques the theoretical model that dominates mainstream research in strategic human resource management. Contributions include: the critique is developed from an explicit model of the employment relationship; new concepts of "weak contingency" and "strong contingency" are introduced; the standard hypothesis of a positive sign on the human resource management variable in firm performance studies is shown to be incorrect for a competitive economy (it should be zero); and the analysis is based on "first principles" of institutional economics and industrial relations.
Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this journal. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author for more information.
Business and Management not elsewhere classified