• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • The Right to Silence at Trial: A Critique and a Call for a New approach

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    O'Sullivan_2007_02Thesis.pdf (2.112Mb)
    Author(s)
    O'Sullivan, Helen
    Primary Supervisor
    Johnstone, Richard
    Other Supervisors
    Hunter, Rosemary
    Keyes, Mary
    Year published
    2007
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This thesis addresses two questions: what is the current law on the right of an accused to remain silent at trial? And, what is the impact of the right to silence on the participants in criminal trials? The right to silence at trial was not introduced until the mid-late eighteenth century, and was not entrenched until the late nineteenth century. Today, it is accepted as a fundamental principle underpinning the common law adversarial criminal trial. The thesis argues that the right to silence is treated as fundamental and inviolate when there is no justification for doing so. When examined closely, it is exposed as a doctrine ...
    View more >
    This thesis addresses two questions: what is the current law on the right of an accused to remain silent at trial? And, what is the impact of the right to silence on the participants in criminal trials? The right to silence at trial was not introduced until the mid-late eighteenth century, and was not entrenched until the late nineteenth century. Today, it is accepted as a fundamental principle underpinning the common law adversarial criminal trial. The thesis argues that the right to silence is treated as fundamental and inviolate when there is no justification for doing so. When examined closely, it is exposed as a doctrine or rule which lacks consistency, clarity and predictability. The thesis begins with a detailed analysis of the Australian appellate court decisions, and reveals a trend towards an absolute right to silence. Under the current law, the accused is not expected to give evidence at trial, except in rare and exceptional circumstances where there are facts additional to those in the Crown case which are known only to the accused. The move to an absolute right to silence is interrogated within contexts where the courts are failing to address the numerous exceptions to the principle. Other influences on the right to silence are examined, including legislation facilitating scientific proof, common law doctrines such as silence in the face of accusation, reverse onus provisions in legislation, and compulsory defence disclosure. The thesis reveals the gaps and incongruities in the way the right to silence is understood, how it is practiced, and its effect on a ‘fair trial,’ not just for the accused, but also for the accuser, and the community at large. Unlike the current literature, the thesis deconstructs the right to silence, and seeks to avoid the current slippage between the right to silence on the one hand, and the presumption of innocence, the privilege against self-incrimination, and the burden of proof on the other. The right to silence is re-conceptualised as a choice with consequences, which may or may not be unfavourable to the accused, an issue which it is argued, is for the jury to determine in each case. The thesis probes the appellate court decisions and commentary by academics and legal practitioners on the reasons for the continuing existence of the right to silence and its importance in the criminal trial. The thesis concludes that the reasons offered are fractured and inadequate.
    View less >
    Thesis Type
    Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
    Degree Program
    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
    School
    Griffith Law Shool
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2839
    Copyright Statement
    The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
    Item Access Status
    Public
    Note
    The request for restricted paper and digital access for a period of 12 months has been approved, with effect from 8 November 2007.
    Subject
    Right to silence (law)
    Australian appellate court
    Common law
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365202
    Collection
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander