• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Chief Executive Officer Remuneration and the ‘Two-Strikes’ Rule of Australia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Faghani_2016_01Thesis.pdf (1.795Mb)
    Author(s)
    Faghani, Mahdi
    Primary Supervisor
    Monem, Reza
    Other Supervisors
    Ng, Chew
    Year published
    2016
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Over the past two decades, executive remuneration has been a topic of considerable controversy. The perceived inability of boards of directors to set optimal executive pay, together with the revelation of corporate scandals and subsequent collapse of high-profile companies, has fuelled intense public debates about executive pay. Regulators here and abroad have been forced to address these growing concerns. With the view to improving the accountability of executive pay and to restraining ‘excessive’ executive pay, Australia introduced the Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) ...
    View more >
    Over the past two decades, executive remuneration has been a topic of considerable controversy. The perceived inability of boards of directors to set optimal executive pay, together with the revelation of corporate scandals and subsequent collapse of high-profile companies, has fuelled intense public debates about executive pay. Regulators here and abroad have been forced to address these growing concerns. With the view to improving the accountability of executive pay and to restraining ‘excessive’ executive pay, Australia introduced the Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011, with effect from 1 July 2011. Unlike previous legislation, under which shareholders’ votes on remuneration reports were non-binding, this new ‘say on pay’ (SOP) legislation, widely known as the ‘two-strikes’ rule in Australia, has specific and predictable consequences. Under this new rule, the board of directors (except the chief executive officer) of a firm listed on the Australian Securities Exchange may potentially face re-election if the remuneration report receives 25% or more ‘no’ votes at the Annual General Meeting in two consecutive years.
    View less >
    Thesis Type
    Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
    Degree Program
    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
    School
    Griffith Business School
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/334
    Copyright Statement
    The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
    Item Access Status
    Public
    Subject
    Boards of directors
    Exxecutive remuneration
    Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365255
    Collection
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander