Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSampford, Charles
dc.contributor.authorBrown, A. J. (Alexander J.)
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-23T02:21:27Z
dc.date.available2018-01-23T02:21:27Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.doi10.25904/1912/3408
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/365665
dc.description.abstractThrough the late 20th century, global society experienced waves of unprecedented political and institutional change, but Australia came to be identified as "constitutionally speaking... the frozen continent", unable or unprepared to comprehensively modernise its own fundamental laws (Sawer 1967). This thesis opens up a subject basic to, but largely unexplored in debate about constitutional change: the territorial foundations of Australian constitutional thought. Our conventional conclusions about territory are first, that Australia's federal system has settled around a 'natural' and presumably final territorial structure; and second, that this is because any federal system such as possessed by Australia since 1901 is more decentralised and therefore more suitable than any 'unitary' one. With federalism coming back into vogue internationally, we have no reason to believe our present structure is not already the best. Reviewing the concepts of territory underpinning colonial and federal political thought from 1815 to the present day, this thesis presents a new territorial story revealing both these conclusions to be flawed. For most of its history, Australian political experience has been based around a richer, more complex and still evolving range of territorial ideas. Federalism is fundamental to our political values, but Australians have known more types of federalism, emerging differently in time and place, than we customarily admit. Unitary values have supplied important symbols of centralisation, but for most of our history have also sought to supply far less centralised models of political institutions than those of our current federal experience. Since the 1930s, in addition to underutilising both federal and unitary lines of imported constitutional theory, Australian politics has underestimated the extent to which our institutional treatment of territory has itself become unique. Despite its recent fall from constitutional discourse, territory is also again on the rise. While political debate has been poorly placed to see it, Australia has experienced a recent resurgence in ideas about territorial reform, offering the promise of a better understanding of the full complexity of our constitutional theory and a new 'unfreezing' of the assumption that territorially, Australia will never change. This thesis seeks to inform these vital new debates.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherGriffith University
dc.publisher.placeBrisbane
dc.rights.copyrightThe author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
dc.subject.keywordsAustralia
dc.subject.keywordsAustralian history
dc.subject.keywordsterritory
dc.subject.keywordsterritorial
dc.subject.keywordsfederation
dc.subject.keywordsfederal government
dc.subject.keywordspolitics
dc.subject.keywordspolitical
dc.subject.keywordsconstitutional
dc.subject.keywordsConstitution
dc.titleThe Frozen Continent: The Fall and Rise of Territory in Australian Constitutional Thought 1815-2003
dc.typeGriffith thesis
gro.facultyFaculty of Arts
gro.rights.copyrightThe author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
dc.contributor.otheradvisorAiro-Farulla, Geoff
dc.contributor.otheradvisorPatapan, Haig
dc.rights.accessRightsPublic
gro.identifier.gurtIDgu1315282192912
gro.identifier.ADTnumberadt-QGU20041105.092443
gro.thesis.degreelevelThesis (PhD Doctorate)
gro.thesis.degreeprogramDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
gro.departmentKey Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance
gro.griffith.authorBrown, A J J.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record