Toyota and Nissan: Reinterpretation of the Japanese Auto Keiretsus

View/ Open
Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Liew, Leong
Other Supervisors
Selvanathan, Antony
Year published
2013
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Toyota is one of the most successful companies in the world, when measured by market shares and profitability. Journal articles and books explaining Toyota’s success abound. More recent research has tended to focus on Toyota alone while earlier studies examined the competitive advantage of the Japanese automobile industry as a whole.
The path of inquiry into Toyota’s success began with the concept of keiretsu. Keiretsu is a Japanese form of networking. It is typically found in the automobile and electronics industry. It involves close collaboration between the assemblers and their respective parts suppliers for mutual benefits, ...
View more >Toyota is one of the most successful companies in the world, when measured by market shares and profitability. Journal articles and books explaining Toyota’s success abound. More recent research has tended to focus on Toyota alone while earlier studies examined the competitive advantage of the Japanese automobile industry as a whole. The path of inquiry into Toyota’s success began with the concept of keiretsu. Keiretsu is a Japanese form of networking. It is typically found in the automobile and electronics industry. It involves close collaboration between the assemblers and their respective parts suppliers for mutual benefits, and it is thought to be initiated by private enterprises with no relation to government industrial policy. Both Toyota and Nissan are believed to have adopted similar keiretsu governance, which is considered by academia and industry experts as one reason why in the 1980s and the 1990s, Japan as a whole outperformed the auto industry in both the U.S.A. and Europe. However, the 1990s saw Nissan struggling to keep up with Toyota’s performance. Nissan, which had supposedly adopted the same governance structure as Toyota, found itself increasingly mired in debt and finally abandoned its keiretsu supplier network in 1999. The concept of keiretsu as a source of competitive advantage for the Japanese automobile industry is heard no more. Academia turns to the Toyota production system in search of the secrets that drive Toyota’s success beyond imitation. This thesis questions the assumption that Toyota and Nissan shared similar governance structures. It examines how a post-war industrial policy led to the adoption of two different keiretsu structures by Toyota and Nissan as each assembler had a specific set of resources and competences. However, different keiretsu structures did not result in inter-firm performance differences between the two competitors throughout the duration of the industrial policy. What then is the source of Toyota’s competitive advantage and its inimitability? This dissertation reinterprets the post-war business history of the Japanese automobile industry and unravels how an unusual bargaining process between Toyota and its most significant strategic partner – Denso – confounded researchers in the literature.
View less >
View more >Toyota is one of the most successful companies in the world, when measured by market shares and profitability. Journal articles and books explaining Toyota’s success abound. More recent research has tended to focus on Toyota alone while earlier studies examined the competitive advantage of the Japanese automobile industry as a whole. The path of inquiry into Toyota’s success began with the concept of keiretsu. Keiretsu is a Japanese form of networking. It is typically found in the automobile and electronics industry. It involves close collaboration between the assemblers and their respective parts suppliers for mutual benefits, and it is thought to be initiated by private enterprises with no relation to government industrial policy. Both Toyota and Nissan are believed to have adopted similar keiretsu governance, which is considered by academia and industry experts as one reason why in the 1980s and the 1990s, Japan as a whole outperformed the auto industry in both the U.S.A. and Europe. However, the 1990s saw Nissan struggling to keep up with Toyota’s performance. Nissan, which had supposedly adopted the same governance structure as Toyota, found itself increasingly mired in debt and finally abandoned its keiretsu supplier network in 1999. The concept of keiretsu as a source of competitive advantage for the Japanese automobile industry is heard no more. Academia turns to the Toyota production system in search of the secrets that drive Toyota’s success beyond imitation. This thesis questions the assumption that Toyota and Nissan shared similar governance structures. It examines how a post-war industrial policy led to the adoption of two different keiretsu structures by Toyota and Nissan as each assembler had a specific set of resources and competences. However, different keiretsu structures did not result in inter-firm performance differences between the two competitors throughout the duration of the industrial policy. What then is the source of Toyota’s competitive advantage and its inimitability? This dissertation reinterprets the post-war business history of the Japanese automobile industry and unravels how an unusual bargaining process between Toyota and its most significant strategic partner – Denso – confounded researchers in the literature.
View less >
Thesis Type
Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
Degree Program
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School
Griffith Business School
Copyright Statement
The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
Item Access Status
Public
Subject
Toyota car industry
Nissan car industry
Japanese car industry
Keiretsu (networking)
Competitive advantage in industry