Effects of Compression and Window Size on Remote Acoustic Identification Using Sensor Networks

View/ Open
Author(s)
Gonzalez, Ruben
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2010
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Recently the cost-benefits of automated sensing over traditional field surveys for population management of fauna has been recognised [1,2]. Remote monitoring through automatic identification based on sensor networks has followed one of two approaches [3,7,18]; using the sensor nodes to perform data analysis within the network or alternatively using the sensor network as a means for collecting data to be centrally processed. In either case a key goal is minimising power consumption in sensor nodes which imposes constraints on both processing and communication capabilities. While the first approach aims to minimise communication ...
View more >Recently the cost-benefits of automated sensing over traditional field surveys for population management of fauna has been recognised [1,2]. Remote monitoring through automatic identification based on sensor networks has followed one of two approaches [3,7,18]; using the sensor nodes to perform data analysis within the network or alternatively using the sensor network as a means for collecting data to be centrally processed. In either case a key goal is minimising power consumption in sensor nodes which imposes constraints on both processing and communication capabilities. While the first approach aims to minimise communication requirements the other aims to reduce processing requirements. In the context of sensor networks for remote monitoring utilising centralised processing, this paper considers the impact on two different strategies for reducing communication requirements on the overall system performance.
View less >
View more >Recently the cost-benefits of automated sensing over traditional field surveys for population management of fauna has been recognised [1,2]. Remote monitoring through automatic identification based on sensor networks has followed one of two approaches [3,7,18]; using the sensor nodes to perform data analysis within the network or alternatively using the sensor network as a means for collecting data to be centrally processed. In either case a key goal is minimising power consumption in sensor nodes which imposes constraints on both processing and communication capabilities. While the first approach aims to minimise communication requirements the other aims to reduce processing requirements. In the context of sensor networks for remote monitoring utilising centralised processing, this paper considers the impact on two different strategies for reducing communication requirements on the overall system performance.
View less >
Conference Title
2010 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICSPCS)
Copyright Statement
© 2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.
Subject
Artificial intelligence not elsewhere classified
Signal processing
Wireless communication systems and technologies (incl. microwave and millimetrewave)