Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Leo, Diegoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDudley, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorAebersold, Carolineen_US
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorRanson, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.editorMartin B Van Der Weydenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:33:38Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.modified2011-03-07T08:52:39Z
dc.identifier.issn0025729Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/36839
dc.description.abstract擵icide and intentional self-harm are issues of major importance in public health and public policy, with rates widely used as progress indicators in these areas. 恣curate statistics are vital for appropriately targeted prevention strategies and research, costing of suicide and to combat associated stigma. 敮derreporting of Australian suicide rates probably grew from 2002 to 2006; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) suicide data were at least 11% or 16% undercounted (depending on case definitions) in 2004. 扮 coronial cases with undetermined intent for 2005 to 2007, intentional self-harm was found in 39%. 擹stemic reasons for undercounting include: (i) absence of a central authority for producing mortality data; (ii) inconsistent coronial processes for determining intent, as a result of inadequate information inputs, suicide stigma, and high standards of proof; (iii) collection and coding methods that are problematic for data stakeholders; and (iv) lack of systemic resourcing, training and shared expertise. 撥vision of data after coronial case closure, beginning with ABS deaths registered in 2007, is planned and will reduce undercounting. 援her reasons for undercounting, such as missing or ambiguous information (eg, single-vehicle road crashes, drowning), differential ascertainment (eg, between jurisdictions), or lack of recorded information on groups such as Indigenous people and gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people require separate responses. 恠systemic coordinated program should address current inaccuracies, and social stigma about suicide and self-harm must be tackled if widespread underreporting is to stop.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherAustralasian Medical Publishing Company Pty. Ltd.en_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/192_08_190410/del10779_fm.htmlen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom452en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto456en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue8en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalMedical Journal of Australiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume192en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMental Healthen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111714en_US
dc.titleAchieving standardised reporting of suicide in Australia: rationale and program for changeen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, Australian Institute for Suicide Research & Preventionen_US
gro.date.issued2010
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record