Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHindmarsh, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.editorDaiwie Fuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:10:02Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.modified2011-03-07T08:56:04Z
dc.identifier.issn18752152en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12280-010-9155-9en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/36941
dc.description.abstractIn late 2007, after signing the Kyoto Protocol, a new Australian federal government committed to generating 20% of Australia's electricity from renewable energy by 2020, for a transition to a low carbon economy. With wind energy the most viable technology for such expansion, little recognition, however, was paid to intense social conflict surrounding wind farm location. By 2006, inadequate community engagement had emerged as the primary governance issue underpinning a host of issues that local communities faced with the prospect of hosting wind farms. Acknowledged by all Australian governments as an issue to address for effective renewable energy transitions, current policy responses addressing community engagement are analysed for their adequacy to ensure such transitions in a context of democratic legitimacy and fairness and the issues of place-based local communities. Analysis is informed by comparative cross-jurisdictional policy learning analysis featuring European participatory developments; policy analysis of current Australian governmental policy responses; and prior narrative analysis of the behavioural rationalities (the underlying beliefs, attitudes and perceptions) that inform the qualifications and place-protective actions about wind farm location of local stakeholders at the forefront of wind farm contestation: landscape guardian groups. The conclusion is that current policy responses with regard to community engagement, which encourage a largely inform-consult participatory engagement approach, are inadequate. A more promising approach is the collaborative approach, which can also facilitate social mapping of local community qualifications and boundaries about wind farm location alongside technical mapping of wind resources, to identify the most socially, economically and technically viable locations to locate wind farms to ensure effective renewable energy transitions.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom541en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto563en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEast Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume4en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironment Policyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode160507en_US
dc.titleWind Farms and Community Engagement in Australia: A Critical Analysis for Policy Learningen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.date.issued2010
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record