Systematic Quantitative Literature Review on Criminological Theories in Asia
Embargoed until: 2018-12-14
MetadataShow full item record
Empirical work on criminological theories in Asia has been increasing. However, few comprehensive and systematic reviews on the application of criminological theories in Asia have been conducted. Using a systematic quantitative literature review method on peer-reviewed English-language journal articles, we aim to provide an overview of the use of five major criminological theories in Asia: (1) strain; (2) social learning; (3) control; (4) routine activity; and (5) developmental and life-course. In particular, we address the following four questions: (1) how often are these theories tested in which region of Asia?; (2) what methodology is used to test these theories?; (3) to what extent are these theories supported in the Asian context?; and (4) what cultural uniqueness in the Asian context is taken into account in testing these theories, and what role and effect do they play in analysis and outcome? Findings indicate that the relationship between these theories and the Asian regions is skewed; many studies do not employ rigorous methodologies; these theories are either fully or partially supported in the Asian context; and only a few studies have analyzed the cultural uniqueness of the Asian context, and no effect of cultural uniqueness of the Asian context was found. Research implications for developing criminology in Asia are discussed.
Asian Journal of Criminology
© 2017 Springer Netherlands. This is an electronic version of an article published in Asian Journal of Criminology, pp 1–23, 2017. Asian Journal of Criminology is available online at: http://link.springer.com/ with the open URL of your article.
This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.
Criminology not elsewhere classified