• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Theses
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • The Factors Influencing Sustainability Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation on Companies Operating in China

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Shi, Kan_Final Thesis_Redacted.pdf (1.731Mb)
    Author(s)
    Shi, Kan
    Primary Supervisor
    Mia, Lokman
    Winata, Lanita
    Year published
    2017-02
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Sustainability disclosure has emerged as a main tool for communicating a company’s commitment and contribution to the environment and society. Various theories have been developed to provide explanations and predictions that attempt to understand sustainability disclosure behaviour. Empirical studies, likewise, adopt different theoretical frameworks, conventionally linking one or more firm-specific characteristics to sustainability disclosure practice. Despite the extensive work has already been done by researchers in sustainability disclosure behaviour, there are still research gaps to be bridged. This study is inspired by ...
    View more >
    Sustainability disclosure has emerged as a main tool for communicating a company’s commitment and contribution to the environment and society. Various theories have been developed to provide explanations and predictions that attempt to understand sustainability disclosure behaviour. Empirical studies, likewise, adopt different theoretical frameworks, conventionally linking one or more firm-specific characteristics to sustainability disclosure practice. Despite the extensive work has already been done by researchers in sustainability disclosure behaviour, there are still research gaps to be bridged. This study is inspired by the imperativeness of understanding the sustainability disclosure behaviours and focuses on a specific group of Chinese companies that are facing legitimacy crises. The purpose of this study is to investigate the motivations for, and the determinants of, corporate sustainability disclosure behaviour. Following a strand of literature which considers legitimacy as a main motivation for sustainability disclosure, companies facing legitimacy crises have been identified to make a comparison to those companies not facing legitimacy crises. Additionally, sustainability performance and corporate governance are investigated as salient determinants of corporate sustainability disclosure. This study examines the direct and interactive effects of legitimacy crises, sustainability performance and corporate governance on the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosure. The findings of this study could contribute theoretically to the extant literature on the how legitimacy crises, sustainability performance and corporate governance could individually influence a company’s sustainability behaviour. Moreover, one novel contribution of this study is the proposal of an interactive relationship of the three factors that have long been considered as independent and how they jointly influence corporate sustainability disclosure. The targeted sample group in this study comprises the companies facing legitimacy crises. Internet searching on news archive, government websites and other external sources has helped to identify those companies exposed involved in environmental and social misconduct in a period from 2010 to 2015. These companies form the original sample (i.e. misconduct group); and a control group of companies is formed by matching their size, ownership structure, industry and the year of observation to this original sample (non-misconduct or match group). The total sample size, 414 observations across six years, includes 207 observations in the misconduct group and 207 in the non-misconduct (match) group. Two sets of analyses were performed to test the hypotheses: comparison tests and regression analyses. Mean comparison tests provided preliminary results, while the mean of the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosure is compared. Regression analyses employed an OLS regression model and tested two sets of models on: (a) the direct effects of legitimacy crises, sustainability performance, and corporate governance on both the quantity and the quality of sustainability disclosure; (b) the interactions of the above three factors on the quantity and the quality of sustainability disclosure, including the interactions between any two factors and one three-way interaction. Additional regression analyses were performed to explore the effects of sustainability performance and legitimacy crises on the changes in the quantity and the quality of sustainability disclosure. The core findings of this study are: (i) sustainability performance and corporate governance are significantly and positively associated with the quantity and the quality of sustainability disclosure, whereas legitimacy crisis is positively associated with the quantity, but negatively associated with the quality of sustainability disclosure; (ii) sustainability performance has no considerable influence on the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosure in the misconduct group, but has significantly positive effect on the quantity and quality of sustainability in the non-misconduct group. In contrast, corporate governance is significantly and positively associated with the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosure in both the misconduct and non-misconduct groups; (iii) the three-way interaction is discussed according to eight scenarios (based on the changes in the three variables) and is presented statistically as positively associating with both the quantity and the quality of sustainability disclosure. These findings could lead to future investigation on the interactive effects of individual factors which have long been treated as irrelated. Moreover, this study provide evidence on “contingent” determinants rather than “fixed” determinants. To be specific, motivation for sustainability disclosure could be different, such as for legitimacy purpose or for resource-based purpose, under various circumstance.
    View less >
    Thesis Type
    Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
    Degree Program
    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
    School
    Dept Account,Finance & Econ
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2711
    Copyright Statement
    The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.
    Subject
    Companies
    China
    Sustainability disclosure
    Corporate governance
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/371142
    Collection
    • Theses - Higher Degree by Research

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander