Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorne, Avril C.
dc.contributor.authorWebb, J. Angus
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Erin
dc.contributor.authorArthington, Angela
dc.contributor.authorMcClain, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authorBond, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorAcreman, Mike
dc.contributor.authorHart, Barry
dc.contributor.authorStewardson, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Brian
dc.contributor.authorPoff, N. Leroy
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T03:39:01Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T03:39:01Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2296-665Xen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fenvs.2017.00089en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/373039
dc.description.abstractSignificant progress in environmental flow management has occurred in recent years due to several factors. These include governments committing to environmental flow programs, significant progress in scientific understanding, and environmental flow assessment methods that are cognizant of stakeholder participation and co-design. However, there remain key challenges facing environmental water management. In this paper, we report on a horizon scanning exercise that identified the questions, which, if answered, would deliver much needed progress in the field of environmental water management. We distributed an online survey to ask researchers and practitioners in the field of environmental water management to identify the key questions. The authors then consolidated 268 submitted questions and organized them into key themes. The consolidated list was presented to a workshop of environmental water researchers and practitioners, where attendees were asked to review the questions, vote on the most important, and provide feedback on gaps, issues, or overlaps. The breadth of issues facing environmental water management is captured by the six key themes into which questions were classified: (1) Ecological knowledge and environmental flow assessment methods, (2) Adaptive management, (3) Integrated management and river objectives, (4) Knowledge transfer: applying best practice in a global context, (5) Community knowledge and engagement, and (6) Active management. These questions provide a roadmap for research and management innovations that will improve the effectiveness of environmental flows programs.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom89-1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto89-11en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFrontiers in Environmental Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume5en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchFreshwater Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode060204en_US
dc.titleResearch priorities to improve future environmental water outcomesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
gro.rights.copyright© 2017 Horne, Webb, O'Donnell, Arthington, McClain, Bond, Acreman, Hart, Stewardson, Richter and Poff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record