Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Fossen, Anthonyen_US
dc.contributor.authorLafferty, Georgeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:32:12Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.modified2007-03-29T07:59:20Z
dc.identifier.issn00103802en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/3740
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the capacity of local communities and sub-national governments to influence patterns of tourism development, within the context of a globalizing economy. Through a comparison of the contrasting examples of Hawaii and Queensland, the paper indicates the consequences of different approaches to land use regulation. It points to the importance of planning and policy processes that integrate community interests, in order to achieve long-term, sustainable tourism development. Effective regulation of development can minimize the social and environmental impacts of tourism. The paper illustrates how community organizations and sub-national governments can articulate local interests, despite the global demands of investors for more deregulated markets in land.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.publisher.placeUKen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://cdj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/36/3/198en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom198en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto211en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCommunity Development Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume36en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode349901en_US
dc.titleContrasting Models of Land Use Regulation:Community, Government and Tourism Developmenten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Humanities, Languages and Social Sciencesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightThis is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Community Development Journal following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Community Dev J 2001 36: 198-211 is available online at: http://cdj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/36/3/198en_AU
gro.date.issued2001
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record