Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrenzler, Timothyen_US
dc.contributor.authorRonken, Carolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T10:41:17Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T10:41:17Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.modified2007-03-30T06:10:19Z
dc.identifier.issn14668025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/3750
dc.description.abstractProblems of recurring corruption have stimulated major reforms in policing in many countries in the last 30 years. Considerable advances have been made in recruitment, training, complaints investigations and external oversight of conduct. However, continuing problems have prompted a search for more effective forms of misconduct prevention. This article examines the situation in Australia in relation to the emerging and controversial anti-corruption strategy of integrity testing. The study is concerned with `integrity tests' that simulate misconduct opportunities for serving officers-not pre-employment screening tests. The eight police agencies in Australia were asked to supply information on planned or implemented testing programmes as well as information on policy perspectives and debates. Only three jurisdictions were identified as conducting targeted testing. The success of these programmes in identifying misconduct suggests this may be an essential anti-corruption device and leaves a question mark over the adequacy of accountability in jurisdictions without this capacity. Two other agencies were planning to introduce targeted testing. While some agencies had given serious consideration to random integrity testing, legal, ethical and practical concerns have meant that no programmes have been introduced except for drug and alcohol testing. The latter also appears to be a useful tool to improve police conduct. The article concludes with a theoretical review of the possible benefits of randomized testing as a form of behavioural audit.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.publisher.placeUKen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://crj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1/3/319en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom319en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto342en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCriminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practiceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume1en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode390403en_US
dc.titlePolice Integrity Testing in Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Criminology and Criminal Justiceen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2001 Sage Publications. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. First published in Criminology & Criminal Justice. This journal is available online: http://crj.sagepub.com/content/vol1/issue3/en_AU
gro.date.issued2001
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record