Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHe, Jiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBao, Cun-Kuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorShu, Ting-Feien_US
dc.contributor.authorYun, Xiao-Xueen_US
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Daheen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Lexen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T12:13:29Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T12:13:29Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.modified2013-05-29T08:23:24Z
dc.identifier.issn01959255en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eiar.2010.09.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/37512
dc.description.abstractSustainable development or sustainability has been highlighted as an essential principle in urban master planning, with increasing recognition that uncontrollable urbanization may well give rise to various issues such as overexploitation of natural resources, ecosystem destruction, environmental pollution and large-scale climate change. Thus, it is deemed necessary to modify the existing urban and regional administrative system so as to cope with the challenges urban planning is being confronted with and realize the purpose of urban sustainability. This paper contributed to proposing a mechanism which helps to make urban planning with full consideration of issues with respect to sustainable development. We suggested that the integration of urban planning, SEA and ecological planning be a multi-win strategy to offset deficiency of each mentioned political tool being individually applied. We also proposed a framework where SEA and ecological planning are fully incorporated into urban planning, which forms a two-way constraint mechanism to ascertain environmental quality of urban planning, although in practice, planning and SEA processes may conditionally be unified. Moreover, as shown in the case study, the integration of the three political tools may be constrained due to slow changes in the contextual factors, in particular the political and cultural dimensions. Currently within the context of China, there may be three major elements which facilitate integration of the three political tools, which are (1) regulatory requirement of PEIA on urban planning, (2) the promotion or strong administrative support from government on eco-district building, and (3) the willingness of urban planners to collaborate with SEA experts or ecologists.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom549en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto560en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue6en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume31en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode059999en_US
dc.titleFramework for integration of urban planning, strategic environmental assessment and ecological planning for urban sustainability within the context of Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2011
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record