Comparisons on the differences in numerical modelling methods between pre-bored pressuremeter and self-bored pressuremeter

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Phangkawira, Fredrik
Ong, Dominic Ek Leong
Choo, Chung Siung
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2016
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Numerical modelling has proved its versatility in assisting to solve many engineering problems. It has also opened many
opportunities for interpretations of material testing which cannot be obtained by the means of analytical approaches alone. Numerical
approach is one of the favourable alternatives in interpreting effective strength parameters of highly fractured and weathered rocks from
pressuremeter tests. While there are many different types of pressuremeters nowadays, with different designs and tests procedures, the
numerical modelling process might not be the same for every instrument. This paper serves to review the ...
View more >Numerical modelling has proved its versatility in assisting to solve many engineering problems. It has also opened many opportunities for interpretations of material testing which cannot be obtained by the means of analytical approaches alone. Numerical approach is one of the favourable alternatives in interpreting effective strength parameters of highly fractured and weathered rocks from pressuremeter tests. While there are many different types of pressuremeters nowadays, with different designs and tests procedures, the numerical modelling process might not be the same for every instrument. This paper serves to review the difference between two of the most common types of pressuremeters, namely pre-bored pressuremeters (PBPM) and self-boring pressuremeters (SBPM). The two instruments were compared in terms of their physical designs, working mechanisms, test procedure and most subsequently, the impact of their testing characteristics on the numerical modelling process.
View less >
View more >Numerical modelling has proved its versatility in assisting to solve many engineering problems. It has also opened many opportunities for interpretations of material testing which cannot be obtained by the means of analytical approaches alone. Numerical approach is one of the favourable alternatives in interpreting effective strength parameters of highly fractured and weathered rocks from pressuremeter tests. While there are many different types of pressuremeters nowadays, with different designs and tests procedures, the numerical modelling process might not be the same for every instrument. This paper serves to review the difference between two of the most common types of pressuremeters, namely pre-bored pressuremeters (PBPM) and self-boring pressuremeters (SBPM). The two instruments were compared in terms of their physical designs, working mechanisms, test procedure and most subsequently, the impact of their testing characteristics on the numerical modelling process.
View less >
Conference Title
Proceedings of the Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference 2016: Contributions of Young Geotechnical Engineers to Nation Building
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© 2016 Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the conference's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Subject
Construction Engineering
Structural Geology
Environmental Monitoring