How I Would Spend $100 Million to Reduce Crime: A Reaction

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Mazerolle, Paul
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2017
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
When first asked to provide a reaction to Rick Sarre's comprehensive essay on how he
proposes to spend $100 million to reduce crime, of course I obliged. However, upon further
reflection, it seemed like a potentially bad idea. I thought through the opportunity and
reflected that assuming this role would be a bit like criticising Gandhi - given Rick's status
in the field. As a leading academic in crime prevention, among other areas, a former President
of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, and a highly respected scholar,
there is arguably little that I could add to this issue. I recognised that providing a ...
View more >When first asked to provide a reaction to Rick Sarre's comprehensive essay on how he proposes to spend $100 million to reduce crime, of course I obliged. However, upon further reflection, it seemed like a potentially bad idea. I thought through the opportunity and reflected that assuming this role would be a bit like criticising Gandhi - given Rick's status in the field. As a leading academic in crime prevention, among other areas, a former President of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, and a highly respected scholar, there is arguably little that I could add to this issue. I recognised that providing a discerning reaction would be difficult and would carry some degree of risk as it would require some very keen observations to provide insights over and above what could be expected from the ideas and interpretations provided by Rick. Indeed, I can think of very few criminologists and social policy thinkers in Australia who have contributed more to broadening our understanding in the crime and justice and crime prevention field than Rick Sarre. And while I acknowledge the risks, I am pleased to proceed given the opportunity to provide a few insights on Rick's substantial thoughts on this important topic.
View less >
View more >When first asked to provide a reaction to Rick Sarre's comprehensive essay on how he proposes to spend $100 million to reduce crime, of course I obliged. However, upon further reflection, it seemed like a potentially bad idea. I thought through the opportunity and reflected that assuming this role would be a bit like criticising Gandhi - given Rick's status in the field. As a leading academic in crime prevention, among other areas, a former President of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, and a highly respected scholar, there is arguably little that I could add to this issue. I recognised that providing a discerning reaction would be difficult and would carry some degree of risk as it would require some very keen observations to provide insights over and above what could be expected from the ideas and interpretations provided by Rick. Indeed, I can think of very few criminologists and social policy thinkers in Australia who have contributed more to broadening our understanding in the crime and justice and crime prevention field than Rick Sarre. And while I acknowledge the risks, I am pleased to proceed given the opportunity to provide a few insights on Rick's substantial thoughts on this important topic.
View less >
Journal Title
Current Issues in Criminal Justice
Volume
28
Issue
3
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© 2017, Published by The Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Subject
Criminology
Criminology not elsewhere classified
Sociology